This monograph analyses the strategic evolution of Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) from a single-vessel family enterprise in 1970 to the world’s largest container shipping line. It examines four phases of development: early family-driven operations, global expansion, alliance-based industry consolidation, and recent scale acceleration. The study explores MSC’s diversification across maritime and logistics sectors, including cruise shipping, ports, logistics and air cargo, interpreting these moves through strategic management frameworks such as the resource-based view and real options theory. A comparative analysis with Maersk highlights contrasting industry models. The monograph concludes that MSC’s success derives from coherent long-term strategy, disciplined investment, and strong family governance.
Maritime chokepoints are critical components of the global transport system because they concentrate shipping movements within geographically restricted passages and connect major maritime regions. Their strategic importance extends beyond navigation: disruption may affect international trade, energy security, freight costs, supply-chain reliability and relations among states. However, the term maritime chokepoint is frequently applied without sufficient conceptual precision, leading narrow straits and artificial canals to be grouped with open-sea routes and other strategically important maritime locations. This work examines the historical and military origins of the chokepoint concept, distinguishes chokepoints from related geographical and geopolitical concepts, including shatterbelts, corridors, and gateways, and establishes the defining characteristics of a maritime chokepoint. Particular attention is given to the distinction between strict geographical and broader functional interpretations. On this basis, the work argues that the Cape of Good Hope, the Cape Horn, and Cape Leeuwin, although indispensable strategic passages and important alternatives, should not be classified as maritime chokepoints. Unlike a strait, channel or canal, they do not physically confine vessels between opposing shores or restrict navigation to a single passage. This conceptual distinction provides the foundation for a more consistent classification of primary and secondary maritime chokepoints and for the subsequent examination of their commercial, navigational and geopolitical significance.